1
Overview of agriculture in the Commonwealth Pacific
Eleven countries in the Pacific are members of the Commonwealth. For the purpose of this study, these have been split into two categories: (1) Small Island Developing States (SIDS), herein referred to as Pacific SIDS, and (2) Australia and New Zealand.
SIDS are a group of developing countries, mostly comprised of small islands, which tend to share similar sustainable development challenges. Except for Australia and New Zealand, all the Pacific countries that are members of the Commonwealth are classified as Pacific SIDS in this study. These countries include Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu.
Just like is the case with the Caribbean countries, the Pacific SIDS are characterised by remoteness, poor infrastructure, vulnerability to external shocks, dependence on imported food, small size, limited resources and isolation from markets. In the Pacific SIDS, traditional farming systems characterised by customary practices and societal norms in the production of crops are predominant.
Below is a summary of characteristics of agriculture in the Commonwealth Pacific.
Food production systems in high (volcanic) islands (large and middle size)
- Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Samoa, Tonga, and Vanuatu: Agroforestry, staples like root crops and breadfruit; export commodities; horticulture and limited livestock. There is increasing reliance on imported rice, wheat, energy-dense, nutrient-poor, and cheap imported foods.
Food production systems in low islands (mainly coral atolls)
- Kiribati, Nauru, and Tuvalu: Staples in Tuvalu include coconut, pulaka, taro and supplemented by banana, papaya and breadfruit. Kiribati mainly grows copra, taro, breadfruit and vegetables.
There is currently no formal commercial farming in Nauru
Despite the close geographical proximity to the Pacific SIDS, Australia and New Zealand differ significantly.
First, both nations have per capita gross national incomes higher than $12,536. Per the World Bank classification, this makes them high-income countries. Second, the structure of agriculture in these two countries is different from the structure in the Pacific SIDS as discussed below.
Agriculture in both New Zealand and Australia is characterised by the presence of few farms, but of very large sizes. Average farm sizes in Australia are 10,702 acres (4,331 hectares) and 667 acres (270 hectares) in New Zealand.
Operating at a large scale presents several scale advantages:
- Large farms can leverage scale technologies, for example GPS-equipped smart farming technologies that allow for the reduction of the amounts of applied inputs and other smart farming technologies such as GPS-assisted tractors, drones, satellite images as these are mostly viable on large-scale and monoculture farming. Technological advancements have had a significant impact on farm operations, shifting the agricultural industry to a much more capital-intensive model and resulting in larger farms and increased productivity.
- Operators of larger farms also have better access to information, because of higher human and financial capacity. Similarly, larger agri-food firms generally have more capacity to carry out innovation activities, acquire technology, deal with regulations, and access export markets.
“In the Pacific SIDS, traditional farming systems characterised by customary practices and societal norms in the production of crops are predominant.”
“The agriculture sector in the Commonwealth Pacific SIDS is grossly under-funded.”
Systemic constraints affecting agriculture in Commonwealth Pacific
Countries across Commonwealth Pacific face several systemic constraints to developing their agricultural sectors.
These include:
- Climate vulnerability and agricultural productivity
- Access to finance and investment
- Market, trade and supply chain issues
- Women and youth inclusion
2
3
State of digital agriculture in the Commonwealth Pacific
The state of digital agriculture in the region is assessed using the digital agriculture framework described under the methodology section.
It consists of (I) digital agriculture innovations, (II) agriculture data infrastructure, (III) business development services, and (IV) the enabling environment for the digitalisation of agriculture.
“Agriculture in both New Zealand and Australia is characterised by the presence of few farms, but of very large sizes.”
i
Digital agriculture innovations
- In Commonwealth Pacific SIDS, an exhaustive listing of all digital agriculture solutions in the region remains largely unavailable, though four were purposively sampled.
- In Australia & New Zealand, the majority of digital solutions offer crop-based preharvest-advisory services. This arises because advisory is not offered as a single solution but as a bundled service with other digital agriculture value propositions.
Distribution of digital agricultural solutions by use case - Australia & New Zealand
Crop-based pre-harvest advisory
Research and data management
Animal-based pre-harvest advisory
n=163 solutions
ii
Agriculture data infrastructure
- With the exception of Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Tonga and Vanuatu, all Commonwealth Pacific SIDS have no national identification scheme.
- Land in the Pacific SIDS is largely under customary tenure.
- All Pacific SIDS have weather data collected by Government provided metrological agencies.
- Both Australia and New Zealand have Government-run metrological departments that collect weather data.
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) estimates that in Australia, 87 per cent of the farmers collect at least one type of data.
- Both New Zealand and Australia have robust land information systems that are linked to hydrographic and property information.
“Customary and other informal rights and norms are often not recognised or recorded, implying that most of the land, while occupied, has no unique identifiers.”
iii
“The incentive for consumption of digital agriculture solutions in New Zealand and Australia is based on the cost reduction potential of digital solutions.”
iv
Enabling environment for digitalisation
The enabling environment for agriculture digitalisation consists of technology-related and non-technology-related enablers and barriers.
Technology-related enablers include access to internet-enabled and mobile devices, penetration of smartphone devices, network coverage, and internet-related infrastructure that enables digital solutions and technologies.
Non-technology-related enablers include regional demography, education levels amongst farming populations, mobile network-friendly policies, and financing models for mobile devices.
Internet use, proportion of population, Pacific SIDS
Nauru
Fiji
Tuvalu
Tonga
Samoa
Policy recommendations to fast-track digitalisation
Recommendations for Commonwealth Caribbean countries to increase investment in digital agriculture innovation and scale-up solutions to market include:
- Creating regulatory sandboxes that provide an environment for companies to experiment with innovative fintech products and service
- Investing in formalisation, and digitalisation of land tenure for smallholder farming entities
- Supporting smallholder farmers in their transition to commercial agriculture from small scale agriculture
- Incentivising solution providers to sell products through cooperatives instead of directly through smallholders
4
Footnotes
1 Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, FAOSTAT. Data retrieved on August 8, 2021. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
2 Economic Report (2016). Asia-Pacific: agricultural perspectives. https://economics.rabobank.com/publications/2016/february/asia-pacific-agricultural-perspectives/
3 Fukagawa, N.K. and L.H. Ziska (2019). Rice: Importance for Global Nutrition.
4 OECD (2018). Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation.